Daily Archives: January 3, 2014



If you are taking a drug pill for your “mental illness” chances are very great that you have been scammed into a lifelong addiction by your biased psychiatrist and the drug companies which are raking in billions of dollars a year. Follow the money and corruption is what you usually find at the end of the big money trail.

About 60 years ago only about 3 to 5% were diagnosed with mental illness. Today it is about 25% and the percentage is rising steadily on a yearly basis. Even young children with behavioral discipline problems are being given pills for ADHD as the quick fix diagnosis and treatment solution. Only .5 % are diagnosed with ADHD in France and in many other European and Asian countries and in the United States it is as high as 9% and rising fast!!! Just these statistics alone are proof enough that the gullible public is being scammed by the drug companies and psychiatrists.

There are 374 mental disorders more accurately called behavioral disorders which appear in the psychiatric manual and the recommended treatment is pills with terrible side effects in almost all cases.

If you have mood swings then you are bipolar, if you are unhappy and unmotivated in life then you are depressed, if you get overly excited then you have an anxiety disorder, if you are hyper  then you have ADHD, if you have bizarre thoughts then you are schizophrenic, and if you can’t concentrate, sleep, or think clearly then you need to be on one of the many medications being prescribed by the psychiatric profession.

The classification of behavioral problems as mental illnesses has gotten so out of hand that there was even a suggestion of classifying one as “compulsive shopping disorder” and “compulsive internet disorder” to be treated by yet another drug!!!!!!

The notorious unprovable “chemical imbalance” in the brain is being combated with drugs which cause real new chemical imbalances in the brain called side effects which are frequently the same effects as the diagnosed pseudo problem. Psychotic drugs frequently cause more insomnia, more anxiety, more manic behavior, and more depression etc., especially when you start to withdraw from the prescribed medication.

The Federal Drug Administration has “professional” advisors on its committees who have conflicts of interest because almost all of them are being paid by the drug companies and many earn a very good income from drug company sponsorships.

Most of the psychotic drugs have effects no better than placebos or sugar pills and there is no proof that any of the medications cure anything but merely mask the symptoms and frequently have severe debilitating side effects treated with more pills.

The biggest and most dangerous special interest groups are the drug companies with their big ad campaigns with many prominent psychiatrist names as sponsors. The drugs cost pennies to make and yield profits as high as 5000% if you don’t include their bogus expensive clinical trial costs.

Here is a link to a rather lengthy proof of the scamming of the gullible public.


If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them.




9% of school aged children are diagnosed with ADHD in the United States. Only .5% are diagnosed in France and the numbers are significantly less in other European nations. Good nutrition and good parenting styles are the probable reasons why ADHD is so low in France. American offspring need better parenting and better food not drugs with bad side effects!!!!!!

The same can also be probably said for misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia, and other “mental illnesses” where popping a pill is the answer and not healthy eating and radical behavior modification to cure what is frequently a bad dysfunctional lifestyle and not mental illness but merely a bad deviation from normative behavior.’’

Here is the proof in psychologytoday.com.


If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them.




Steal: v. to illegally take by force and/or by the threat of force and/or by fraudulent means

Murder or killing is stealing life, adultery is stealing fidelity, lying is stealing the truth, and being arrested is stealing mobility. Whatever should be illegal in society is discussing whether something is being stolen and under what circumstances the stealing may be justified, which is frequently emergency situations.

Stealing is not an absolute moral law even though stealing possessions is almost always wrong. Stealing has exceptions and it can be legally permitted within reason under five general circumstances: During a self-defense war, in personal self-defense, for food during food emergencies, taxation, and law enforcement or public self-defense.

During a Self-Defense War:   Any and almost all stealing variations can be permitted during war with the exception of mutual nuclear destruction.  Forcibly taking the life of enemy soldiers and destroying or forcibly taking enemy property during war is an example of stealing enemy life and property which is justified as long as you are the country that was attacked first.

Starting a war should be a crime but fighting one is not a crime if it is done in self-defense.

In Personal Self-Defense:   One should try to use minimal force in a personal bodily attack unless instant death is threatened or a struggle against a lethal weapon is involved.  If you are struggling against the threat of a lethal weapon and kill the attacker in the process then this is legally justified and you should not be punished such as going to jail.

Defending your personal property with a lethal weapon under circumstances where there is no legal authority present is justified.   An honest armed citizen is the best defense against a national tyranny or the tyranny of criminals when law enforcement is on strike or out of not present during an emergency such as a hurricane.

Even under normal conditions an honest citizen has a right to defend his property with a weapon against invasion by drug addicts and sociopaths when the police are not immediately present.

Stop or I will shoot you in the leg!  This is an example of a threat which should be permitted especially by businessmen who are just trying to protect their property when the police are not immediately present.  If the criminal is maimed for life then it is a just result since it is a just price to pay for giving in to drug addiction or criminal temptations or being mentally out of lawful control.

Stealing a life in self-defense can be justified as shown above.

For Food Emergencies:  Stealing food when one is starving to death is understandable as long as the person from whom the food is being stolen is not also starving to death.

It also is acceptable to forcibly steal the life of domesticated animals and plants which we use as food.  On the other hand we should not steal the life of wilderness plants and animals so that biodiversity may be conserved and even expanded.

Stealing the real estate which wilderness plants and animals live on is a not so obvious way of reducing their numbers and thereby also reducing biodiversity.  Yes stealing the life of wilderness plants and animals and stealing the land that they live on should be a very serious crime!

Taxation:  Stealing money from individuals through taxation is legal and justified to provide military security and government services that theoretically promote the welfare of the nation even though there is a tendency for the government to also promote with special laws special interest groups that have political and/or economic power and frequently have little or no connection with the general welfare.

The government is using the threat of severe fines and even forceful imprisonment if you don’t pay your taxes.  Yes the government is stealing your tax money but it is legal!  Huge amounts of money are stolen by the government and the higher the taxes the more unjust the government is and the more of a thief the government becomes.  Government distribution of taxes to special interest groups and poor members of society not based on merit is an unjust distribution of wealth.

Law enforcement or public self-defense:

When police make an arrest they are nonfraudulently stealing the right to free mobility from criminals and law violators who are endangering the public safety.

When the mentally ill or drug addicts under the influence of drugs  threaten people in motor vehicles they can be forcibly arrested.  When criminals are arrested for their crimes force and frequently the threat of force is used by the police.  Another way of communicating it is that police have the right to nonfraudulently steal some of your liberty if you have committed a crime or are immediately endangering the lives of innocent people.  Thus nonfraudulently stealing the right to free mobility or nonfraudulently stealing some of your liberty is legal when justified and done by the police for justified reasons.

Law enforcement is nonfraudulent stealing justified by society for the greater good or welfare of all its citizens.   Almost everyone doesn’t feel that police steal anything but I have just shown you that police do in fact legally and nonfraudulently steal some of your liberty if the law and real circumstances justifies it.

A final note. To combat cyber criminals who prey upon the public it is possible to justify eavesdropping or stealing information from suspected criminals who are using the internet and that means being able to spy on their money transactions on the internet by accessing their personal account information which may be anywhere in the world. Coordinating this kind of stealing of information across international borders is a problem yet to be solved by some international laws which all the countries of the world should comply with.

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially JUSTICE.


common_sense (1)