Tag Archives: dark energy

THERE PROBABLY IS DARK MASS OR DARK MATTER BUT WHAT IS IT???

Ethan Siegel in this article shows clearly that unknown dark mass and/or matter must exist and maybe takes part in little bangs which form galaxies. What I disagree with him on is that there was a big bang for the universe as a whole since it has always existed and will always exist into the foreseeable future.

Does dark mass follow the laws of physics with the same relationships between dark mass, dark energy, and dark gravity? No one will have concise answers until we have instrumentation which measures the dark frequencies or energy involved in the equations.

Dark is unknown and unmeasurable so until nature reveals this information with human made detection devices, we will never know the true answer to what dark mass or matter, dark frequencies, dark energy, and dark gravity are.

To make statements that there are percentages of dark mass and energy is an absurdity because how can you mathematically determine the percentage if you can’t even measure the dark substances. It is a colossal myth to state that there are dark percentages of substances in the universe. All scientists are just not smart enough to calculate percentages of the unknown. It is scientific bullshit!!!!!!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ethansiegel/2015/04/29/dark-matter-is-necessary-for-the-origin-of-life/

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1500 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT SUBATOMIC PARTICLES+

Leave a reply

When a heavy lepton decays, one of the particles it decays into is always its corresponding neutrino. The other particles “could be” a quark and its antiquark, or another lepton and its antineutrino.

This pretty much summarized the dark hole of knowledge which subatomic particle physics has become. Ok, a “heavy” lepton decays into a neutrino, quark and antiquark, or another lepton and its antineutrino. What does a neutrino, quark, antiquark, lepton, or antineutrino decay into?

Is there such a thing as a “heavy” quark, heavy antiquark, heavy neutrino or heavy anitneutrino?

No one knows or probably will know with any degree of scientific precision because decay chains beyond one decay are not readily observable scientifically.

Charged subatomic particles mysteriously appear and then quickly disappear by changing into other particles and/or energy and no one really knows or can describe the process accurately with measurable results. It is even possible that subatomic particles not only transform into other more stable particles but that some of their energy and mass may actually become part of dark mass or dark energy which is undetectable by any scientific instrumentation which we currently have.

Dark energy is about 73 % of the universe, dark mass or matter is 23% and that leaves about 4% comprising planets, stars, electromagnetic radiation, and lifeforms.

That charge is conserved in the universe leads to concepts of matter and antimatter colliding and forming the universe about 14 billion years ago yet there seems to be more matter than antimatter left over and no one can explain why because it is probably the wrong way of thinking about the “creationist” origins of the universe in the first place. Antimatter and matter never collided in such great quantities in the first place because the universe has always been around and was never created or recycled from prior universes or forms of matter and/or energy!!!

Rational and logical conclusion: matter and antimatter did not collide together billions of years ago. An even more devastating indictment of this philosophical theoretical assumption is-Where did the matter and antimatter come from or how was it formed or created and for religious believers by whom?

Subatomic particle detectors only detect charged particles and electromagnetic waves and if there are any neutrally charged particles or if there is any dark mass or energy then no detection is possible. Unfortunately we will never have all the answers to this insurmountable dilemma until we can detect the undetectable! Try and accelerate non charged neutrons using an electromagnetic field and make them collide with one another. Mission impossible for now!

I am not one advocating the cessation of investigations into subatomic particles because it is entirely possible that some new rational knowledge will eventually come from it. I personally like experimentation on a grand scale with billion dollar equipment.

“Magical” subatomic particles being created and decaying is a highly skilled endeavor and maybe someday the decay chains of subatomic particles will be uncovered with greater precision. For the time being, some of that knowledge may be useful in answering what actually exists in the space of a black hole which has such great gravitational force.

Charge is theoretically conserved but what if it isn’t in some cases? No one knows. If charge is conserved then maybe a photon is two charges or identical frequencies rotating in opposite directions creating an attractive force which keeps the photon together. No one knows yet.

Onward you half crazed scientists boldly striving for a potentially great future of rational logical knowledge about the workings of the universe!!!

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1300 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

WHAT IS IN A BLACK HOLE SINCE TIME AND SPACE EXIST THERE ACCORDING TO NEW THEORY?

Leave a reply

Finally a little sanity is coming into theoretical physics. In the article posted it says that if time and space exist then there is a black hole possibility. Then the next serious questions which arise are what occupies that space within a black hole? Is it pure energy according to string theory or is it a form of matter which is more compact than a hydrogen atom? Maybe it is some form of compacted nuclei without electrons. Maybe it is compacted subatomic particles. Maybe it is a combination of energy and matter and it may even be a form of dark mass and dark energy.

If it is a form of dark mass or energy then we basically will never have an answer until we devise a scientific instrument on the face of this earth which will measure and detect dark mass and energy or even dark gravity.

Unfortunately we can’t visit a black hole and find out so we have complicated matters and one simple theory such as string theory will probably not answer all of the questions which will arise in the future about black holes.

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-black-holes-space-theory.html

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BIG BANG+

Leave a reply

Humans are limited in their thinking by observations on earth and everything on earth seems to have a birth and death cycle. Humans, animals, plants, planets, stars, and galaxies all seem to be created, go through a life cycle and die. So it seems to make intuitive sense that the universe too must have a birth and death life cycle.

This approach to explaining the universe is called creationist theory and whether you believe that the universe was created six thousand years ago or 15 billions of years ago you are still stuck with the idea that the universe was created from nothing or from infinite matter, energy, and gravity which expanded into a void or vacuum at the constant speed of light and is still expanding.

Why was there nothing before the beginning of the universe and was that the beginning of time itself? No one knows or has even tried to explain this. What happened billions of years before the beginning of the universe? No one has an answer to this question either. Did the universe really have a beginning or is it really infinite in all directions and has existed forever in the past and will exist forever in the future?

If your answer to the last question is yes that time and the universe is really infinite with no beginning or end then you have a radical new view of the universe which runs counter to the current Mythology of both science and religion.

Let’s cover the possible reasons why the big bang is probably a wrong theory or view of the universe all based on current scientific evidence.

To make classical theory about the universe fit we have had to invent the magical concept of dark matter or mass, dark energy, and even dark gravity.

So the question arises. Did the universe expand into dark matter, dark energy, and dark gravity which means that there was no void or vacuum to begin with called space or did infinite dark matter, dark energy, and dark gravity expand along with regular matter, energy, and gravity into a void or empty space? A true logical dilemma. If space was really dark matter or mass, dark energy, and gravity then how was it put in place or how was it created?

The only way out of this seeming paradox is to assume that the universe has always been around and always will be in infinite space and that only galaxies, stars, and planets undergo life and death cycles but not the universe itself. The red shift which was used as evidence to prove the expansion of the universe can in fact be explained by light having a variable speed and slowing down as it travels light years through dark matter or mass.

It also does not make much logical sense that galaxies have black or grey holes and that the universe itself was a black or grey hole which created billions of other black or grey holes. There is either one huge black hole from which the universe formed or billions of smaller black holes which formed galaxies. I prefer the billions of smaller black holes in galaxies and would exclude the idea of one huge black hole for the universe. That belief is another reason why I don’t believe in the big bang theory which is really unproven and unprovable.

There is relatively uniform background radiation consisting mostly of microwaves and x-rays so it is entirely possible that visible light is just not energetic enough to reach us from the remote parts of the universe beyond what can be seen with the eye. Microwaves and x-rays reach us but not light which gets degraded or loses velocity by dark mass as it travels billions of light years through it.

Time is an independent variable and not dependent on distance. You can count three jelly beans per second or you can measure distance traveled in meters per second. If I said I’ll meet you in three hours then this says nothing about the distance that you will travel and is independent of the distance.

Relativity as a mathematical tool is useful but you have illogical results such as not aging as much if you travel close to the speed of light and being able to kill your parents before you were born if you travel faster than the speed of light and travel back in time. We all know that traveling back in time is an absurd notion but mathematically according to relativity it is a possibility.

Because of creationist theory we also have absurd notions of a possible chain of bubble universes linked by worm holes and if you put three of them together then their distance is 42 light years long. It is time to end the BS, not link time and space together, and start eliminating singularities or absurdities such as infinite mass, energy, and gravity. Do you really believe that the universe was created from such a singularity 14 billion years ago?

I would just like to add that the universe has turbulence which doesn’t follow simple general relativity equations as explanations for it. Thanks to the Hubble telescope we are in fact finding out how complex the universe really is and that one bit of evidence or one mathematical equation or one principle will never completely explain everything which is going on in the universe.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY!!!

Leave a reply

According to the false theory of the expansion of the universe the galaxies are actually expanding at faster than the speed of light thus disobeying general relativity theory. This wrong hypothetical extra gravitational repulsion comes from an independent dimension which contains dark matter and dark energy which only interacts dependently with matter and energy through gravitation. In effect a miraculous parallel universe has been created which mysteriously acts on the physical universe through an additional repulsive force which should really be called dark gravity and not the gravity of the physical universe.

How can this parallel universe of dark matter and dark energy be independent of the physical universe yet light supposedly travels through it unaffected? A truly crazy assumption that light physically travels through a stated independent entity in another dimension.

Dark matter and energy can’t be observed or measured so how can we calculate the frequency or frequencies of it using string theory? Impossible to do! If you crazily assume that light travels through dark matter and dark energy and it exerts a gravitational pull on it then maybe the red shift is the effect that you get. The universe may not be expanding at all but the red shift is due to the effect of dark matter and dark energy on light energy and matter. Physical space which can’t be seen or measured may not be an empty void after all.

Is dark matter denser than dark energy? Does dark matter have dark atoms and dark electrons? There are no answers to these questions but shows how insane these analogies to physical matter and energy are. Science is observation and measurement and not the science of analogies which predate science and mathematics. Once scientists begin to use analogies to describe nature they prove that they don’t know what the f**k they are talking about and are living in the dark ages!!!

Theoretical physicists are trying to play God by inventing miraculous theories to explain what can’t be explained logically and they are creating the modern mythology which is wowing their followers rather than making them recoil in shock and anger that they are in fact being deceived into believing the impossible! What is causing an additional gravitational repulsive force? Why Godlike miraculous dark matter and dark energy!!!

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1200 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT SCIENCE

Leave a reply

Science is basically the study of matter and energy using the scientific method and has been responsible for all technological advancements in society. It is naïve to think that science has or will have all the answers to how the universe works at the smallest and largest level.

Theoretically so far a heavy but small form of matter from which apparently sub atomic particles come from and makes up atoms is the Higgs boson with a Higgs field and mathematically string theory attempts to explain everything in the universe in terms of vibrations which has led to the concept of a holographic universe.

The Hubble telescope has confirmed that there is indeed turbulence in the universe and that concepts such as dark gravity, dark matter, and dark energy which can’t be detected or observed directly with scientific instruments may play a significant role in the universe.

A concept such as a black hole which is an infinitely small point in space with infinite gravity and mass is in fact probably a grey hole where some energy or photons can escape so the concept of a black hole is wrong and a grey hole is also something very ludicrous.

There is evidence of galaxies colliding so this casts doubt on the big bang hypothesis that all matter and energy in the universe originated from an infinitely small point in space or in effect a universal black hole. The concept of an expanding universe or the big bang is actually a modern scientific myth.

The universe may in fact be infinite and relatively homogeneous and there are only little bang localized “grey” holes in the middle of some or all galaxies.

Mathematics as a tool is inadequate and results in singularities in every theory because no one really understands what an infinitely small point in space is and no one understands what infinity really means.

What is the point of all this?

Scientists are totally confused trying to explain the workings of the universe and no one unified theory seems to be a possible explanation including Einstein’s theory of general relativity which is outdated and mostly wrong. Humans are just not smart enough to explain all the intricate workings of the universe and won’t be on into the foreseeable future.

That being said there have been attempts at using science to explain society and politics such as social science and political science and this is all a myth because politics and society can’t be studied with the scientific method and the closest that we can get is explaining politics and society in terms of vague statistical concepts or approximations with no cause effect relationships.

Statistical methods will never come up with a moral code which should govern human behavior and nor will scientific research into animal behavior lead to the discovery of a moral code. In nature no one likes to be stolen from but this is not enough knowledge to formulate political laws which justly distribute information, goods, and services to its citizens, especially the destitute and also unemployed.

Scientists must function independently of social or political monetary pressure to make objective discoveries possible. The corruption of big money in pharmaceutical companies is resulting in many fraudulent clinical statistical experiments conducted by scientists in the study of drugs and many drugs with terrible side effects are being approved by the FDA.

Scientific R&D and the potential benefits which new revolutionary discoveries can make in society are sometimes bought up or kept secret by major corporations who don’t want the new technology to adversely affect their bottom line profits.

For true long duration benefit to society science must be funded by organizations which are impartial and not subject to money or political pressure. If independence from greed in the scientific community is not promoted then science will only be used to promote the politically powerful interests and only biased results will exit science labs.

Scientists are playing God altering the genetic makeup of plants and animals and giant corporations are patenting the results without long duration testing of the resultant products on the human population. Myopic selection of genes based on a few desirable traits such as pest resistance, herbicide resistance, experimental gene insertion from bacteria, size, and fat content are producing Frankenstein crops and animals too dependent on humans which will not be healthy for the human population in the long duration. Emphasis on monopolistic monoculture is going to destroy healthy long duration food biodiversity.

Gene modification has great potential for the manufacturing of many desirable substances biologically but it should not become unproven experimentation on the precious food supply. Uncovered bad effects on long duration human health may be irreversible and disasterously deadly since what you eat can potentially modify the metabolism or genetic functioning of future generations.

Science is a powerful tool which can be used for good and/or bad purposes. Secretive science experimentation should not be going on in private laboratories with diabolical purposes in mind. Financed open source science is vital to monitor the biological products coming out of powerful companies.

Independent research science facilities should exist to thoroughly retest and evaluate new genetic creations and drugs and they should be rewarded financially if they come up proof that indeed the new products flooding the market are indeed too harmful to be accepted into the economies of the world.

CONCLUSION:

Science is a tool which can be used for good and/or bad purposes. Will there be powerful monopolies judging the new biological products or should there be an independent watchdog? I don’t see a danger to the world coming from physical science but I do foresee great danger to the world coming from biological science if it is not objectively monitored with financed open source information.

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them and one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

Enjoy!!!!!!

I PREDICT THE CONSEQUENCES OF DARK GRAVITY!!!!!!

Leave a reply

The Hubble telescope has not only advanced the new concepts of dark matter and dark energy but the only missing link is the discovery of dark gravity or a force which rules the movements and interactions of the dark matter and dark energy and also the universe which we can observe and measure!

With DARK GRAVITY it will be possible to postulate travel at faster than the speed of light and pretty much any hairbrained theory will be possible with this trio of concepts which can’t be measured, can’t be detected, and where imagination will rule the universe. Concepts of omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence will rule physics and astronomy of the near future and it will no longer be the rule of scientific physics but the rule of an unknown Godlike dark force which mankind will not be able to explain.

It is time to refocus our attention on this precious planet earth and save its biodiversity before it is too late and before it results in the premature death of human civilization on the face of this planet!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mScV-aSbGlY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bP4jqqKdk8c

Enjoy!!!!!!