Tag Archives: dark mass

THERE PROBABLY IS DARK MASS OR DARK MATTER BUT WHAT IS IT???

Ethan Siegel in this article shows clearly that unknown dark mass and/or matter must exist and maybe takes part in little bangs which form galaxies. What I disagree with him on is that there was a big bang for the universe as a whole since it has always existed and will always exist into the foreseeable future.

Does dark mass follow the laws of physics with the same relationships between dark mass, dark energy, and dark gravity? No one will have concise answers until we have instrumentation which measures the dark frequencies or energy involved in the equations.

Dark is unknown and unmeasurable so until nature reveals this information with human made detection devices, we will never know the true answer to what dark mass or matter, dark frequencies, dark energy, and dark gravity are.

To make statements that there are percentages of dark mass and energy is an absurdity because how can you mathematically determine the percentage if you can’t even measure the dark substances. It is a colossal myth to state that there are dark percentages of substances in the universe. All scientists are just not smart enough to calculate percentages of the unknown. It is scientific bullshit!!!!!!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ethansiegel/2015/04/29/dark-matter-is-necessary-for-the-origin-of-life/

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1500 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT SUBATOMIC PARTICLES+

Leave a reply

When a heavy lepton decays, one of the particles it decays into is always its corresponding neutrino. The other particles “could be” a quark and its antiquark, or another lepton and its antineutrino.

This pretty much summarized the dark hole of knowledge which subatomic particle physics has become. Ok, a “heavy” lepton decays into a neutrino, quark and antiquark, or another lepton and its antineutrino. What does a neutrino, quark, antiquark, lepton, or antineutrino decay into?

Is there such a thing as a “heavy” quark, heavy antiquark, heavy neutrino or heavy anitneutrino?

No one knows or probably will know with any degree of scientific precision because decay chains beyond one decay are not readily observable scientifically.

Charged subatomic particles mysteriously appear and then quickly disappear by changing into other particles and/or energy and no one really knows or can describe the process accurately with measurable results. It is even possible that subatomic particles not only transform into other more stable particles but that some of their energy and mass may actually become part of dark mass or dark energy which is undetectable by any scientific instrumentation which we currently have.

Dark energy is about 73 % of the universe, dark mass or matter is 23% and that leaves about 4% comprising planets, stars, electromagnetic radiation, and lifeforms.

That charge is conserved in the universe leads to concepts of matter and antimatter colliding and forming the universe about 14 billion years ago yet there seems to be more matter than antimatter left over and no one can explain why because it is probably the wrong way of thinking about the “creationist” origins of the universe in the first place. Antimatter and matter never collided in such great quantities in the first place because the universe has always been around and was never created or recycled from prior universes or forms of matter and/or energy!!!

Rational and logical conclusion: matter and antimatter did not collide together billions of years ago. An even more devastating indictment of this philosophical theoretical assumption is-Where did the matter and antimatter come from or how was it formed or created and for religious believers by whom?

Subatomic particle detectors only detect charged particles and electromagnetic waves and if there are any neutrally charged particles or if there is any dark mass or energy then no detection is possible. Unfortunately we will never have all the answers to this insurmountable dilemma until we can detect the undetectable! Try and accelerate non charged neutrons using an electromagnetic field and make them collide with one another. Mission impossible for now!

I am not one advocating the cessation of investigations into subatomic particles because it is entirely possible that some new rational knowledge will eventually come from it. I personally like experimentation on a grand scale with billion dollar equipment.

“Magical” subatomic particles being created and decaying is a highly skilled endeavor and maybe someday the decay chains of subatomic particles will be uncovered with greater precision. For the time being, some of that knowledge may be useful in answering what actually exists in the space of a black hole which has such great gravitational force.

Charge is theoretically conserved but what if it isn’t in some cases? No one knows. If charge is conserved then maybe a photon is two charges or identical frequencies rotating in opposite directions creating an attractive force which keeps the photon together. No one knows yet.

Onward you half crazed scientists boldly striving for a potentially great future of rational logical knowledge about the workings of the universe!!!

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1300 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

WHAT IS IN A BLACK HOLE SINCE TIME AND SPACE EXIST THERE ACCORDING TO NEW THEORY?

Leave a reply

Finally a little sanity is coming into theoretical physics. In the article posted it says that if time and space exist then there is a black hole possibility. Then the next serious questions which arise are what occupies that space within a black hole? Is it pure energy according to string theory or is it a form of matter which is more compact than a hydrogen atom? Maybe it is some form of compacted nuclei without electrons. Maybe it is compacted subatomic particles. Maybe it is a combination of energy and matter and it may even be a form of dark mass and dark energy.

If it is a form of dark mass or energy then we basically will never have an answer until we devise a scientific instrument on the face of this earth which will measure and detect dark mass and energy or even dark gravity.

Unfortunately we can’t visit a black hole and find out so we have complicated matters and one simple theory such as string theory will probably not answer all of the questions which will arise in the future about black holes.

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-black-holes-space-theory.html

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BIG BANG+

Leave a reply

Humans are limited in their thinking by observations on earth and everything on earth seems to have a birth and death cycle. Humans, animals, plants, planets, stars, and galaxies all seem to be created, go through a life cycle and die. So it seems to make intuitive sense that the universe too must have a birth and death life cycle.

This approach to explaining the universe is called creationist theory and whether you believe that the universe was created six thousand years ago or 15 billions of years ago you are still stuck with the idea that the universe was created from nothing or from infinite matter, energy, and gravity which expanded into a void or vacuum at the constant speed of light and is still expanding.

Why was there nothing before the beginning of the universe and was that the beginning of time itself? No one knows or has even tried to explain this. What happened billions of years before the beginning of the universe? No one has an answer to this question either. Did the universe really have a beginning or is it really infinite in all directions and has existed forever in the past and will exist forever in the future?

If your answer to the last question is yes that time and the universe is really infinite with no beginning or end then you have a radical new view of the universe which runs counter to the current Mythology of both science and religion.

Let’s cover the possible reasons why the big bang is probably a wrong theory or view of the universe all based on current scientific evidence.

To make classical theory about the universe fit we have had to invent the magical concept of dark matter or mass, dark energy, and even dark gravity.

So the question arises. Did the universe expand into dark matter, dark energy, and dark gravity which means that there was no void or vacuum to begin with called space or did infinite dark matter, dark energy, and dark gravity expand along with regular matter, energy, and gravity into a void or empty space? A true logical dilemma. If space was really dark matter or mass, dark energy, and gravity then how was it put in place or how was it created?

The only way out of this seeming paradox is to assume that the universe has always been around and always will be in infinite space and that only galaxies, stars, and planets undergo life and death cycles but not the universe itself. The red shift which was used as evidence to prove the expansion of the universe can in fact be explained by light having a variable speed and slowing down as it travels light years through dark matter or mass.

It also does not make much logical sense that galaxies have black or grey holes and that the universe itself was a black or grey hole which created billions of other black or grey holes. There is either one huge black hole from which the universe formed or billions of smaller black holes which formed galaxies. I prefer the billions of smaller black holes in galaxies and would exclude the idea of one huge black hole for the universe. That belief is another reason why I don’t believe in the big bang theory which is really unproven and unprovable.

There is relatively uniform background radiation consisting mostly of microwaves and x-rays so it is entirely possible that visible light is just not energetic enough to reach us from the remote parts of the universe beyond what can be seen with the eye. Microwaves and x-rays reach us but not light which gets degraded or loses velocity by dark mass as it travels billions of light years through it.

Time is an independent variable and not dependent on distance. You can count three jelly beans per second or you can measure distance traveled in meters per second. If I said I’ll meet you in three hours then this says nothing about the distance that you will travel and is independent of the distance.

Relativity as a mathematical tool is useful but you have illogical results such as not aging as much if you travel close to the speed of light and being able to kill your parents before you were born if you travel faster than the speed of light and travel back in time. We all know that traveling back in time is an absurd notion but mathematically according to relativity it is a possibility.

Because of creationist theory we also have absurd notions of a possible chain of bubble universes linked by worm holes and if you put three of them together then their distance is 42 light years long. It is time to end the BS, not link time and space together, and start eliminating singularities or absurdities such as infinite mass, energy, and gravity. Do you really believe that the universe was created from such a singularity 14 billion years ago?

I would just like to add that the universe has turbulence which doesn’t follow simple general relativity equations as explanations for it. Thanks to the Hubble telescope we are in fact finding out how complex the universe really is and that one bit of evidence or one mathematical equation or one principle will never completely explain everything which is going on in the universe.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/

THE SPEED OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION MAY NOT BE CONSTANT!!!

Leave a reply

A photon is really a particle or wave traveling through dark mass, wrongly called dark matter, at variable speeds of light or like a water wave traveling through water or traveling through dark mass in the case of the photon. The more energetic cosmic rays actually travel faster than light photons and are not limited by the speed of visible light and in fact exceed it. The higher the frequency the faster it travels through dark mass just as waves with more energy travel faster through water. Red light should travel slightly less than the speed of blue light which is more energetic and travels faster. The greater the difference in frequencies the greater is the difference in speeds.

A test of this theory would be to compare the speed of blue light vs. red light and detect whether there is a significant difference in speeds that is measurable. Space is actually dark mass and is not empty or void or a true absolute vacuum. This will eliminate the problem of singularities and absurd concepts such as infinite energy and infinite mass.

Maybe the reverse is true and the more energetic the particle or the greater the frequency the slower it moves through dark mass. Maybe there is an inverse relationship of speed and frequency. It is possible that the higher the frequency the slower the particle would travel and once it reached an infinite frequency it would in fact come to a standstill and not move at all. It would in fact become so big that it would be unable to move.

In a diffraction grating the blue light gets bent more or its wavelength is shorter or has more energy and is thus a larger particle or mass. The diffraction grating and a larger particle or one moving slower would bend more because there is a greater attraction between a more dense slower particle and the diffraction grating material causing the blue light to deflect more than the red light with a lower frequency and faster speed. Maybe particle physics will be back in vogue and everything will be explained in terms of a particle with energy and angular momentum and spin and the larger the energy or mass the more attraction there is and general relativity and quantum physics can indeed be unified into one theory!!!!!!

It is probably wrong to consider time as another dimension of space but that time is independent of distance and there is no time travel possible and the paradox of going back in time and killing your parents will no longer exist! General relativity is the big lie and Einstein’s theory of relativity will return to dust with it’s mythology!!!!!! Time and length are independent variables and not dependent ones!

E=MS2 or energy equals the mass times the velocity or speed of an electromagnetic wave squared. It is not a radical departure from Einsteins famous equation but the speed is not a constant but a variable.

I favor the first version because human experience shows that greater energy translates into greater speed but I may be wrong and I am now leading towards the second explanation the more that I think about it.

A wave dies down with time and dissipates all its energy so it is entirely possible that light traveling through dark mass eventually dissipates some or eventually all of its energy. The red shift observed may be due to the fact of light having less energy as it travels through dark mass compared to freshly created light on the face of the earth which is not red shifted.

What this means is that the universe is not in fact expanding at all but the galaxies remain in relatively stable positions relative to one another but undergo considerable change themselves. The universe is not expanding at all but is relatively constant and this means that galaxies can eventually collide with one another given enough time and are not always moving away from each other as is theorized by the big lie big bang theory.

Background radiation supposedly from the big bang is actually more energetic radiation from unseen stars who have dissipated their light energy before it had a chance to reach earth and only the more energetic electromagnetic waves such as x-rays, micro waves, and cosmic rays make their trip to earth. Background radiation is just proof that the universe is infinitely large and has always existed and will always exist. The background radiation is from unseen galaxies and stars because their visible light does not reach us but dies out but the higher energy particles do reach us. This is further theoretical proof that the universe is more homogeneous and infinite than heretofore thought.

Background radiation comes from 360 degrees so it comes uniformly from all directions and does not have its origin from a point source as predicted by the big bang. The big bang did not occur at all points in space which means that there was no big bang but we are surrounded by unseen stars and galaxies in all points of space as my theory predicts.

The dark mass(matter) absorbs electromagnetic energy as the energy passes through it and this raises the question of what kind of absorption process is it and what happens to the energy which is absorbed? Maybe it becomes dark energy or is absorbed by a dark atom like particle? Who knows? I can’t answer questions to something which I can’t measure or see so I leave this up to the next generations of physicists! The unknown mysterious remarkable miraculous hand of nature is at work. I am in awe!!!!!!

There may in fact be quantum velocities and that would explain why there are dark spaces between spectra and not a uniform distribution of energy possibilities or velocities. As soon as electromagnetic radiation loses some energy in quantum packets it slows down by a quantum velocity!!!!!!

If light can also be considered a particle then it is possible that light itself and other subatomic particles not only have energy but have angular momentum and can spin in opposite directions thus causing one to be deflected to the right and one to the left on collision with a hydrogen atom and loose angular momentum each time it collides with another hydrogen atom and effectively decay to an undetectable velocity or not enough energy to register a visual path in the bubble chamber. This is a wild guess but who knows, maybe I’m right. This is beginning to sound more and more like classical Newtonian physics with quantum energy release and quantum velocity changes.

Conservation of matter or energy would exist but the matter or energy can become so small that they are undetectable even with a bubble chamber. They seem to decay into nothing but in fact they are still there but undetectable with much less matter or energy. The crazy concept of matter and antimatter would be unnecessary and why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe would be a moot question because there is no such concept necessary.

If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1200 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.

For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.

Enjoy!!!!!!

If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!

https://uldissprogis.com/zlist-of-my-most-popular-blogs/