Mathematics is an imprecise tool for the physical world when the concept of zero and infinity is used in equations. It leads to metaphysical conclusions about the physical world.
In relativity there is infinite energy, mass, gravity or a black hole at a point in space leading to incomprehensible questions about what happens to information or whether physical reality gets totally destroyed. New theories are getting more realistic and addressing the singularity problem claiming that in the real world a black hole must occupy space and time which the classical theory of relativity totally ignores.
In string theory there is the concept of infinite energy or frequency when the two points of a vibrating string meet. String theory still has not addressed the problem theoretically of this singularity and it is just a question of time before it too will be updated and one will assume that the string or vibration must occupy space or volume and time for it to be a valid theory.
I welcome an attempt to eliminate singularities from equations because without their elimination the creationist frame of mind will persist and scientists will be creating something out of nothing on into the foreseeable future. I believe in the conservation of something which gets transformed and sometimes appears as energy, mass, or gravity and I definitely don’t believe that that something can be totally destroyed or disappear into a void.
Yes, it is possible that that something may be absorbed by dark mass or dark energy or dark gravity and seem to disappear from the universe that we can measure and observe but I don’t believe that that something can be destroyed into nothingness or zero.
I also don’t believe that time can be created or destroyed but is infinite unless applied in quantum intervals to the physical world. With this approach it is illogical to ask the questions- When did time begin? or Can we begin time all over again from zero?
Cycles or vibrations per second and distance per second are the ways that time is used to try and understand reality. One is string theory and the other is relativity. Can string theory and relativity be merged?
String theory tries to address the concept of number per second and relativity tries to address the concept of distance per second. Merging the two theories means number and distance must be combined which is an impossibility because number and distance are two independent variables. That is why neither string theory nor relativity is a total answer to what the physical world is really like but both if merged will have two independent variables whose values will never really be known.
It is the problem of two independent not dependent variables. String theory assumes dependence of vibrations and time and relativity assumes dependence of distance and time. Neither explanation will ever be the total truth of a complete explanation of physical reality.
The scientific underlying problem is describing a particle or wave standing still and one in motion all using one equation. Maybe the particle or wave always moves in straight lines or in orbit around other particles or waves but you still have to differentiate between the two possibilities. The particle or wave is either moving in orbit around a relatively large or small mass or moving in a straight line away from that mass and can’t be doing both at the same time. If mass is just energy or a wave then how do you describe energy “standing still”?
Yes, there is distance or wavelength in a frequency but how then is this wavelength related to the distance traveled by the particle or wavelength or WHAT determines when the frequency is relatively stationary and when it is not relatively stationary but in linear motion? Maybe the quantum frequency(s) determines whether it is in linear motion or not and is a quantum phenomenon of go or no go or linear motion or no linear motion. I feel that no one frequency determines the go or no go of an energy packet. So what does?
Information is also energy in motion and stored energy which is relatively stationary. Maybe the key to it all is defining what something or information really is if not a function of energy only or a function of energy and mass but not at the same time. I am currently researching the definition of information and will comment if I learn something new.
One grand simple unified theory of everything mathematically is not possible and anyone in search of a quest to do so is a delusional scientific charlatan. One theory of everything? Delusional BS!!!!!!
If you liked this evergreen truth blog then read more of them, about 1300 so far, or read one or more of my evergreen truth books, especially COMMON SENSE, rays of truth in a human world filled with myths and deceptions.
For a complete readily accessible list of blogs and titles go to twitter.com/uldissprogis.
If you enjoyed this blog then here is a list of my most popular ones which you may also enjoy!!!